- From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2009 17:17:22 +0000
- To: Roger Darlington <rogerarm@freeuk.com>
- CC: www-validator@w3.org
Roger Darlington wrote: > It failed to check about 80% of the html links, claiming that it had > reached the maximum numberr of documents. > > what a pathetic excus. why don't you incresae that number?? Bandwidth and processing power isn't free, and the W3C QA tools, which are free for the public to use, and don't get a whole lot of funding ( http://www.molly.com/2008/12/11/w3c-validators-in-jeopardy/ ). If you want to check a large number of documents, then I suggest you install your own copy of the link checker (there's a download link at the top of the link checker homepage) instead of complaining that you aren't getting enough out of the free service. -- David Dorward <http://dorward.me.uk/>
Received on Thursday, 1 January 2009 17:19:22 UTC