- From: Giovanni Tummarello <giovanni.tummarello@deri.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 16:18:32 +0100
- To: "Shane McCarron" <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
Hi i am aware of the tools but that's exactly why i say it would be very beneficial to help people that are approaching RDFa to give them something that says "yes it is correct and this is what you have written in RDF by the way" .. the only thing that i see close in the list you mention is the RDFa Distiller.. however this would not help if the RDFa is broken (which is going to be a lot of cases when people are testing things) and also does not accept direct text input (which is very useful ..i use it all the time in the w3c RDF validator) hope this helps. I think RDFa is a great chance for Semantic Web initiative to gain actual relevance.. i think its important to make it as easy as possible for people to experiment with it today i was experimenting with it and i didnt find it that easy :-) thus my request Thanks Giovanni On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote: > The validator does not currently extract RDF triples. There are lots of > services that do so, however. You might want to look at > http://rdfa.info/rdfa-implementations/ for a maintained list of tools. Or, > if you have your own development platform, take a look at http://librdf.org > for the Redland libraries - these include native RDFa support. > > ---------------- > Now playing: Evanescence - Farther Away [Live] > <http://www.foxytunes.com/artist/evanescence/track/farther+away+%5blive%5d> > > Giovanni Tummarello wrote: >> >> Hi there, also due to the apparent lack of another service that does >> it, and considering that people are going to do a lot of trial and >> error on RDFa, i think that it would be useful if the validator also >> outputted the RDF output, once extracted from RDF. >> >> Sincerely >> Giovanni >> > > -- > Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 > Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 > ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com >
Received on Thursday, 25 September 2008 15:19:09 UTC