- From: Dr. Olaf Hoffmann <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 20:14:20 +0200
- To: www-validator@w3.org
Olivier Thereaux: > > If I remember correctly, the specification says that if you want to > validate, using the doctype is recommended. > > And indeed, > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#a_deployment Ah, yes, nice, I did not see it. I did not look yet in the informative appendices. It is no problem of course to add this, to check documents. > > > Is it possible, that the validator can identify the version > > automatically with the version attribute to get results > > better fitting to the recommendation? > > In theory yes. That's actually the way we do for SVG 1.0 and 1.1. For them if found the doctypes and use them since years. I think, when I tried, I had only a problem with the SVG basic 1.1 doctype provided in the mobile recommendation - the validator did not like it. But the basic variant is discontinued anyway... > > I don't get the impression that the XHTML WG meant to have RDFa in > XHTML validated without a doctype, but that notwithstanding, the major > barrier to it is a matter of a small-ish patch in the validator. Would > you like to add this as a feature request in bugzilla? > > http://validator.w3.org/feedback.html#bugreport I do not have an account (yet), but if no one else with an account is interested, I can create one ... > > > A similar problem may occur soon as SVG tiny 1.2 > > becomes a recommendation. > > SVG 1.2 is a somewhat different question. Unlike HTML it really > doesn't need a doctype, and indeed the 1.2 version doesn't have a DTD > at all. Yes. It helps a lot to have a reasonable check, especially if one writes tests - one is often surprised about the results and is always looking, if it is only an error in the expectations, in the document, in the viewers or something more serious ;o) This remains a problem, but I did not look around, if there is a program able at least to check a document with this RelaxNG. However, the more tricky things one has to test are only in the prose of the recommendation anyway. Olaf
Received on Tuesday, 25 November 2008 18:26:34 UTC