- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 08:12:29 +0900
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>, mark.birbeck@webBackplane.com, W3C Validator Community <www-validator@w3.org>
Le 6 mai 2008 à 01:53, Shane McCarron a écrit :
> Instead I would give the users a list of known XHTML Family Markup
> languages and let the pick.
Indeed but not helpful to someone who would be mixing in a document
RDFa, ITS, and ARIA.
all these additions have their own interests and documents would
benefit of mixing them.
> Then, of course, provide a validation error because there MUST be a
> DOCTYPE declaration.
Note that this is a conformant document according to "3.1. Document
Conformance" XHTML 2.0 Last version - W3C Working Draft 26 July 2006
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/xhtml2/" xml:lang="en">
<head>
<title>Virtual Library</title>
</head>
<body>
<p>Moved to <a href="http://example.org/">example.org</a>.</p>
</body>
</html>
[1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/conformance.html#s_conform
--
Karl Dubost - W3C
http://www.w3.org/QA/
Be Strict To Be Cool
Received on Monday, 5 May 2008 23:13:04 UTC