- From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 14:36:55 +0900
- To: mark.birbeck@webBackplane.com, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: W3C Validator Community <www-validator@w3.org>
Hello, Mark, Shane, all. In the process of making it easier for authors of XHTML to check their work, we've been looking at one specific type of document: XHTML documents not sporting a Doctype Declaration, but declaring the proper xhtml ns at their root element. Something like: http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/xhtml1-missing-doctype-has-xmlns.xhtml Since the specifications for XHTML all require the presence of a doctype declaration for the document to be "strictly conforming" XHTML (1.0, 1.1, etc) such a document can not be "strictly conforming". Fair enough. But tools could still check it. One idea that we had, was to build a DTD (and maybe an rng schema and xml schema too, why not) describing a "snapshot" of the aggregation of most known modules for XHTML. Such a DTD could be interesting in itself. At this point in time, I am not aware of a DTD-friendly way of checking an XHTML document that uses both the features of ARIA and RDFa, for example. Also, in the context of checking a document with the xhtml ns but no doctype, it would allow a tool to tell for sure if the document strays or not from the "xhtml realm". Do you think: * … it is a good idea? * … you could provide some help in building such a snapshot DTD? * … there would be a way to build this DTD in a way that allows easy addition of new modules? (my knowledge of modular xhtml is limited, so this may be a stupid question) Any help or feedback from the the X(HT)ML/SGML experts on this list would also be much welcome. Thank you, olivier
Received on Monday, 5 May 2008 05:37:31 UTC