"vary with the skill of the user"?! You've not considered the vast majority of users who expect the "tool" to be perfect and the user does not Know HTML At-All. I'd just like to see the Validator enter the main stream and make a difference for people. Right now the tool developers don't seem to care if their code validates. And the Big League web sites - how about validating http://www.google.com/ ???????????????! http://www.yahoo.com/ ?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! - RM David Dorward wrote: > > On 1 May 2008, at 20:53, Rick Merrill wrote: >> I have a suggestion to float: How about adding a summary >> page on the Validator web site where users (like us) can >> add Validator results based on what software was used. > > > Leaving aside the question of the Validator team publishing what is, > effectively, a critique of various software packages, I don't think > this is a good idea. As statistics go, it simply isn't a very useful > one. You wouldn't be comparing like with like - the number of errors > produced would vary with the skill of the user, and the content and > size of each page. > -- http://www.batco.tvReceived on Friday, 2 May 2008 08:25:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:59:08 UTC