- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 10:40:28 +0900
- To: Rick Merrill <rickmerrill@comcast.net>
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
Le 2 mai 2008 à 04:53, Rick Merrill a écrit : > I have a suggestion to float: How about adding a summary > page on the Validator web site where users (like us) can > add Validator results based on what software was used. > > For example, > > DreamWeaver: 15 pages; 25 errors; html 4.0 transitional The only way to do that in a painless way for authors is to collect a meta name in the headers of files. I suspect you want the compiled stats on how badly performs some authoring tools, maybe something else. But the data set will be of poor quality: - not a huge number of pages with the meta. - more than one authoring tool involved in the generation of pages (sometimes multiple libraries, database, javascript) - author changing authoring tool, but forgetting to modify the meta It will be very hard to have relevant statistics in such open environment. -- Karl Dubost - W3C http://www.w3.org/QA/ Be Strict To Be Cool
Received on Friday, 2 May 2008 01:41:03 UTC