- From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 01:33:36 +0100
- To: www-validator@w3.org
olivier Thereaux wrote: > I wrote "rough consensus" because "the consensus as it seems > to have happened, based on the stories I have heard and the > eventual result" would be too long :) Yeah, a mental trick of server admins thinking that folks not running their own server, or at least arranging write access on dot-files, are by definition too silly to talk about... ;-) It reminds me of Fidonet. They have a point, but there are so many users, and only a few server admins (in comparison). > Do you have a pointer to discussions on the http-wg list? http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.org.w3c.miscellaneous/1223/focus=880 > I would agree that the current recommendation of the HTTP > spec is broken, and I suspect everyone agrees with that. I > also suspect that finding a solution that works while > following certain constraints (backward compatibility?) > must be a nasty headache. Yes, a headache, one hard constraint is no new MUST, 2616bis is supposed to stay at "draft standard", that permits to fix errors, remove unused features, clarify, arguably twist MAY into SHOULD NOT or similar, but no "good" 2616 implementation can end up as "broken" as far as 2616bis is concerned, and of course no HTTP/1.2 or similar stunts, that would violate the WG Charter (apart from being a rathole and bad idea). > I think the validator does look at the xml declaration as > a source. See e.g the following test case: > http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/charset-xmldecl.xhtml Valid and UTF-8, do you have a similar test not using UTF-8 ? With a default UTF-8 it is not obvious what triggered UTF-8. My example was <http://xyzzy.webhop.info/home/ltru/4645bisU.xml> sending text/xml without charset resulting in US-ASCII and a fatal validation error for the UTF-8 XML. Another server sends application/xml without charset, there I get valid and UTF-8. For authors the only safe bet is using US-ASCII for XML, sometimes "I18N" is odd... :-) Warning, huge test file, and its content is now obsolete. Frank
Received on Wednesday, 12 March 2008 00:31:37 UTC