- From: Pablo Neirotti <dotmacintosh@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 13:11:39 -0300
- To: "David Dorward" <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
- Message-ID: <c5bf0fcc0807040911i73235097rd8e17c2782e8b002@mail.gmail.com>
All right, but that's their solution to not have to deal with string
contents. There should be no problems, as whatever is written in a string is
to be stored in memory or a property. It's like a bug they are not willing
to fix =P all right, i'll use the alternative proposed: move my dynamically
generated javascript files to a static .js file xD.
So, thanks David for the links! =)
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 6:32 AM, David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk> wrote:
>
> On 4 Jul 2008, at 04:17, ArtPulse wrote:
>
>
>> Error [64]: "document type does not allow element X here"
>>
>> More precisely:
>>
>> Line 38, Column 52: document type does not allow element "b" here.
>> document.getElementById("dAnsDisp").innerHTML = '<b>Vista
>> previa:</b><br />' + str;
>>
>> The validator doesn't realizes it's part of a string, in which HTML
>> entities and others do not matter.
>>
>
> Not true. They do matter.
>
> Is this a "bug"? Or we're not allowed to use HTML code in Javascript
>> strings on XHTML 1.0 Transitional?
>>
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#h-4.8
>
> But I bet you're pretending your XHTML is really HTML so
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#C_4
>
> and see also http://www.webdevout.net/articles/beware-of-xhtml
>
>
> --
> David Dorward
> http://dorward.me.uk/
> http://blog.dorward.me.uk/
>
>
>
--
Art by Pulse at www.artpulse.com.ar
Received on Friday, 4 July 2008 16:12:18 UTC