- From: ~:'' ありがとうございました。 <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
- Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:55:51 +0000
- To: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
David, do you have an example of an SVG+RDF DTD ? http://peepo.co.uk/index.svg has no DTD which is valid for SVG. the W3C validator reports it is well-formed XML, but are the SVG and RDF valid? cheers Jonathan Chetwynd Accessibility Consultant on Media Literacy and the Internet On 16 Feb 2008, at 09:22, David Dorward wrote: On 15 Feb 2008, at 19:27, ~:'' ありがとうございました。 wrote: > RDF embedded in SVG is well formed but breaks the validator* > > please can you resolve this? The validator just compares your markup to the DTD your Doctype claims you are following. Since you are using: <!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC '-//W3C//DTD SVG 1.1//EN' 'http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/1.1/DTD/svg11.dtd'> ...RDF can't be used in the document without it being invalid. You need to switch to an SVG+RDF DTD before you can have a valid document. -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk/ http://blog.dorward.me.uk/
Received on Saturday, 16 February 2008 16:56:07 UTC