- From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:19:49 +0100
- To: www-validator@w3.org
David Dorward wrote: > Having nothing more then the CDATA markers is enough, as is > using > and friends instead of < and co... > ... unless you are serving as text/html (making using XHTML > in the first place | HTTP/1.1 200 OK | Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:06:51 GMT [...] | Content-Length: 30616 | Connection: close | Content-Type: text/html | | <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" | "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> That is XHTML 1.0 transitional text/html for the discussed URL (from my POV, using a HTTP/1.0 GET with a homebrewn user agent). Skipping the anti-XHTML FUD - I didn't say that Javascript is a good idea, that inline <script> elements are a good idea, that an attempt to create inline <style> elements with Javascript dynamically is a good idea, and actually I think this is all HORRIBLY BAD, but it is still possible to get the syntax right. Frank
Received on Friday, 15 February 2008 00:18:51 UTC