Friday, 29 February 2008
- Re: Add Subject Here
- Add Subject Here
- Distorted html problem
- Re: Install on OS X 10.5.2
- Re: Install on OS X 10.5.2
- Install on OS X 10.5.2
Thursday, 28 February 2008
Tuesday, 26 February 2008
- Re: Invalid link when searching "validator" on google
- Re: Invalid link when searching "validator" on google
Sunday, 24 February 2008
- Invalid link when searching "validator" on google
- Re: [VE][127] Error detail doesn't match the error itself
Friday, 22 February 2008
Thursday, 21 February 2008
- Re: Language support
- Re: Possible patch for explicit doctype error message
- Re: undefined value as ARRAY error
- Re: Possible patch for explicit doctype error message
Wednesday, 20 February 2008
Tuesday, 19 February 2008
Wednesday, 20 February 2008
Tuesday, 19 February 2008
- Re: Misleading explanations in checklink reports
- Re: Language support
- Misleading explanations in checklink reports
Monday, 18 February 2008
- Re: validator.nu
- Language support
- Re: Reporting use of <u></u> as invalid for XHTL Strict
- Re: Bug 85/4494 (keeping track of validation statistics for various purposes
- Validating SVG+RDF (Was: SVG: changes to validator)
Sunday, 17 February 2008
- Re: [VE][76] Add Subject Here
- Re: Reporting use of <u></u> as invalid for XHTL Strict
- Reporting use of <u></u> as invalid for XHTL Strict
Saturday, 16 February 2008
Sunday, 17 February 2008
Saturday, 16 February 2008
- Re: RDF embedded in SVG is well formed but breaks the validator
- Re: RDF embedded in SVG is well formed but breaks the validator
- Re: RDF embedded in SVG is well formed but breaks the validator
Friday, 15 February 2008
- RDF embedded in SVG is well formed but breaks the validator
- Re: document type does not allow element "style" here
- Re: document type does not allow element "style" here
Thursday, 14 February 2008
- Re: document type does not allow element "style" here
- Re: undefined value as ARRAY error
- Re: document type does not allow element "style" here
- Re: [VE][38] Add Subject Here
- Re: document type does not allow element "style" here
- Re: [VE][38] Add Subject Here
- Re: document type does not allow element "style" here
- [VE][38] Add Subject Here
- document type does not allow element "style" here
Wednesday, 13 February 2008
Monday, 11 February 2008
Sunday, 10 February 2008
- Re: character "<" is the first character of a delimiter but occurred as data.
- Re: W3C Valid Icons on Secure Web Servers
- Re: character "<" is the first character of a delimiter but occurred as data.
- Re: character "<" is the first character of a delimiter but occurred as data.
- character "<" is the first character of a delimiter but occurred as data.
Saturday, 9 February 2008
Friday, 8 February 2008
- Re: Is checklink missing?
- Re: ([VE][404] and [VE][xmlwf]) && operator assumed as bad ampersand
- Re: ([VE][404] and [VE][xmlwf]) && operator assumed as bad ampersand
- ([VE][404] and [VE][xmlwf]) && operator assumed as bad ampersand
- Re: Questions concerning LogValidator output
Thursday, 7 February 2008
- Questions concerning LogValidator output
- RE: Is checklink missing?
- Re: Bug 85/4494 (keeping track of validation statistics for various purposes
- Re: Is checklink missing?
Wednesday, 6 February 2008
- RE: Is checklink missing?
- Re: Bug 85/4494 (keeping track of validation statistics for various purposes
- Re: Is checklink missing?
- Re: Bug 85/4494 (keeping track of validation statistics for various purposes
Tuesday, 5 February 2008
Monday, 4 February 2008
Sunday, 3 February 2008
Saturday, 2 February 2008
- No source code to validate?
- Re: login area verification
- Re: login area verification
- Re: Problems with ? in URL and IE6 conditional statements
- Re: [VE][68] UL in DIV error with HTML 4.01 Transitional
- Re: login area verification
- Re: Problems with ? in URL and IE6 conditional statements
Friday, 1 February 2008
- login area verification
- [VE][68] UL in DIV error with HTML 4.01 Transitional
- Problems with ? in URL and IE6 conditional statements