Re: HTML Validator HTTP Accept

On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, olivier Thereaux wrote:

> We've had a lot of discussions, and I don't think we're getting much
> in terms of new points and ideas.

I think there is a new point.
If I'm not mistaken some people want(ed) an Accept header because
the W3C validator did not validate XHTML 1.1 served as text/html.

But the validator now does validate XHTML 1.1 served as text/html.

So what's the point of sending application/xhtml+xml to validator.w3.org?

Received on Tuesday, 16 December 2008 17:00:40 UTC