Re: Fallback to UTF-8

• From: Andreas Prilop <prilop2008@trashmail.net>
• Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:32:27 +0200 (MEST)
• To: www-validator@w3.org
• Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0804241628420.14824@s5b004.rrzn.uni-hannover.de>

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Karl Dubost wrote:

> There are discussions going on
> http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/draft-lafon-rfc2616bis-latest.html#canonicalization.and.text.defaults

I do not complain because ISO-8859-1 is the default encoding
in the current edition of RFC 2616.

I complain about this illogical behaviour of the validator:

- First it assumes "charset=utf-8".

- Then it immediately states that this is impossible.

Do you see any logic in this behaviour?

Received on Thursday, 24 April 2008 14:33:20 UTC