On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Karl Dubost wrote: > There are discussions going on > http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/draft-lafon-rfc2616bis-latest.html#canonicalization.and.text.defaults I do not complain because ISO-8859-1 is the default encoding in the current edition of RFC 2616. I complain about this illogical behaviour of the validator: - First it assumes "charset=utf-8". - Then it immediately states that this is impossible. Do you see any logic in this behaviour?Received on Thursday, 24 April 2008 14:33:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:59:07 UTC