W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > April 2008

Re: please add Accept header to http request containing application/xhtml+xml

From: Dean Edridge <dean@55.co.nz>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 13:29:44 +1200
Message-ID: <48094B08.5080601@55.co.nz>
To: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
CC: www-validator@w3.org, Noa Resare <noa@resare.com>

David Dorward wrote:
> On 18 Apr 2008, at 08:58, Noa Resare wrote:
>> In other words, adding "Accept: application/xhtml+xml, */*" to the 
>> requests of the validator would be a nice thing.
> If wouldn't actually help anything though.
> If you are doing content negotiation and then sending exactly the same 
> content, but with different Content-Types, then the validator is going 
> to get the same data either way - so it makes no difference (and the 
> content negotiation is pretty pointless).
> If you do serve up different content, then it makes sense to be able 
> to validate both versions, in which case you'll need to use some other 
> strategy so that you can serve up both to the validator under 
> different circumstances.
> That said: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=112
>> My rewrite rules:
>> RewriteEngine on
>> RewriteCond %{HTTP_ACCEPT} !application/xhtml\+xml
>> RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} \.xhtml$
>> RewriteRule .* - [T=text/html]
> This will serve up application/xhtml+xml if the browser sends Accept: 
> application/xhtml+xml;q=0, text/html (i.e. explicitly rejecting 
> XHTML). You should get a better algorithm.

Hi Noa, David,

I'm currently working on a patch for the Validator that will solve this 
problem, it will also take care of another two bugs (which are the same 
issue really)


Hopefully I will be able to submit a patch to the Validator team within 
a week :)

Dean Edridge
Received on Saturday, 19 April 2008 01:30:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:59:07 UTC