- From: Rado Faletic <rado.faletic@anu.edu.au>
- Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 11:37:32 +1000
- To: www-validator@w3.org
note that in the XHTML1.1 working draft (16 Feb 2007) it says the following: XHTML 1.1 documents SHOULD be labeled with the Internet Media Type text/html as defined in [RFC2854] or application/xhtml+xml as defined in [RFC3236]. What do you think it is that I don't understand? On 29/09/2007, at 12:20 AM, Andreas Prilop wrote: > On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Rado Faletic wrote: > >> Validating http://www.mobility.org.au/ > > | Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 > | > | <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" > | "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd"> > | > | <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" > | content="application/xhtml+xml; charset=utf-8" /> > > You do not understand HTTP. > You do not understand XHTML. > > Please stay away from XHTML and use HTML 4. > > Thank you!
Received on Saturday, 29 September 2007 01:42:01 UTC