- From: NOWAR.MEANS.PEACE@GMAIL <nowar.means.peace@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 14:57:24 +0200
- To: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- CC: www-validator@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2007 12:57:13 UTC
Hello David, Still don't get it: If the use of a backslash leads to NOT showing a page right in FF and Opera, I'd say that's strange. So, does this mean that IE is the "smarter/better" browswer compared to FF and Opera?? mmmm.... By the way, can you come up with a link with the rule that the href attribute is allowed to contain backslash characters (please....)? I have NEVER come across this rule (yet). sherill Tuesday, September 4, 2007, 2:35:09 PM, you wrote: > On 4 Sep 2007, at 08:45, NOWAR.MEANS.PEACE@GMAIL wrote: >> When looking in the source I saw that the links had a BACKSLASH in >> it, instead of a SLASH. >> So why is it that the w3c validator gives a passed validation for a >> sloppy code? > Because, in HTML, the value of the href attribute is allowed to > contain backslash characters. It might not mean what was intended, > but that doesn't make it invalid. > -- > David Dorward > http://dorward.me.uk/ > http://blog.dorward.me.uk/ -- Best regards, NOWAR mailto:nowar.means.peace@gmail.com
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2007 12:57:13 UTC