Najib Tounsi wrote in <www-international.w3.org>: > FYI. Good News There's a catch, compare <http://idn.icann.org/Talk:IDNwiki#Invalid_XHTML_1.0> Which document types actually allow "unencoded" IRIs ? For the purpose of the IDN test wiki "atom" won't do. As long as the W3C validator can't check URI attribute the "good news" is a future interoperability nightmare, <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4916> Frank (copy to the validator list) -- Repost replacing W3C I18N by IETF Apps, for unknown reasons I can't post anymore on the W3C I18N list: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.org.w3c.internationalization.general/2919Received on Sunday, 28 October 2007 16:10:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:59:05 UTC