- From: Validome-Staff <staff@validome.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:40:24 +0200
- To: <www-validator@w3.org>
Hi Frank, > Is than an > issue in the "XHTML 1.0 transitional" schema or in your code ? Neither an issue in our schema, nor an issue in our code. Our schema validator in the current version simply verificates URIs in accordance to appropriate demands: http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-2-20010502/#anyURI "such rules and restrictions are not part of type validity and are not checked by ˇminimally conformingˇ processors. Thus in practice the above definition imposes only very modest obligations on ˇminimally conformingˇ processors. " As you know, there is no so simple as you claim to provide a reliable URI check. At the moment Validome processes URI handling with help of a (simple) schema validation ...It's not exactly brilliant, but - as we know - there is no validaor at the moment, which handles it much better. It is necessary to develop another *concept* for handling URI check. There is someone in our team, who currently works on URI handling concepts in our validator. As "URI" is a nontrivial issue, it will take some more time for modelling and coding an acceptable solution for a sustainable URI check. This will be probably in V3.0 (current version: 2.6.1). BTW: Validome supports validation of IDN domains since May 2007: http://www.validome.org/validate/?uri=http://www.h%c3%a4ndewaschen.de This would also make sense for the W3C-Validator, as it can not handle IDN domain validation till now: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.h%C3%A4ndewaschen.de&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0
Received on Monday, 22 October 2007 12:34:25 UTC