- From: Karim A. <directeur@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 22:31:44 +0100
- To: "Frank Ellermann" <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
Thanks Frank for the feedback I actually interpret the soap responses of both the W3C markup and css validators. Don't know why the css validator acts this way for your redirection, but it gives the same answer as the one xhtml-css.com gives you: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fpurl.net%2Fxyzzy%2Fibm850.htm&warning=1&profile=css21&usermedium=all I actually have a strangest problem with the css part of xhtml-css.com the W3C gives an internal fault which doesn't explain anything about the css itself. Look: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fxhtml-css.com%2Fstatic%2Fxui.css&warning=1&profile=css21&usermedium=all Anyone, btw, with an explanation for this please help!! :) Thanks Karim -- http://akoncept.com Innovate Humanum Es On 11/8/07, Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> wrote: > > Karim A. wrote: > > > Any comments or suggestions are very welcome! > > I tested one of my "validator torture" URLs: > <http://purl.net/xyzzy/ibm850.htm>. It passes > the XHTML check, but somewhere in the CSS test > you drop the ball. > > The W3C CSS validator also hates redirections, > interestingly the W3C validator constructs a > working CSS validation link without redirection > on the fly. > > > Frank > > > >
Received on Thursday, 8 November 2007 21:31:59 UTC