- From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 09:59:02 +0100
- To: Samuel R Kirk <kirxklox@centurytel.net>
- Cc: <www-validator@w3.org>
On 30 May 2007, at 19:54, Samuel R Kirk wrote: > I was told this page; http://www.webhorology.com/valid_abbr.html > was valid xhtml, yet when I validate it by your standards it has > errors. > > Will you confirm that it is or is not valid xhtml? It is not valid XHTML (and, bizarrely, has some elements not in any declared namespace, and other elements in the XHTML namespace). Since it is not XHTML 1.0 (with Appendix C conformance) it is being served with the wrong content-type too. -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk/ http://blog.dorward.me.uk/
Received on Thursday, 31 May 2007 08:59:44 UTC