- From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 08:05:11 +0900
- To: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>, Timmy Brolin <timmy@home.se>
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
On May 16, 2007, at 07:26 , Frank Ellermann wrote: >> The SVG file validates just fine as "SVG 1.1". >> When I try to validate it as "SVG 1.1 Basic" I get no errors, but the >> validator claims that it is not a valid SVG Basic 1.1 file. >> I really think this is a problem in the validator. > >> http://brolin.mine.nu/lego/misc/ethercat.svg > > Check out http://validator-test.w3.org/check - it reports 120 errors: [...] > Something with the > DTD might be really broken. With... > > <!DOCTYPE svg SYSTEM > "http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/1.1/DTD/svg11-basic.dtd"> > > ...I get the same effect, it's no issue in the validator's SGML lib. I looked at it a little this morning, and came to the same conclusion as you. The Beta validator has a bug (or feature?) and does not filter out the errors in the DTD. In any case, opensp really does not like the following construct in the SVG 1.1 DTD: <!-- Post-Framework Redeclaration Placeholder .................... --> <!ENTITY % svg-postfw-redecl.module "IGNORE" > <![%svg-postfw-redecl.module;[ %svg-postfw-redecl.mod;]]> I'll check with the SVG WG about it. Thanks.
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2007 23:05:18 UTC