- From: David Moore <d4hveed@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 11:46:38 -0400
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
- Message-ID: <f6ae34170706220846o5b88cb59jb2c62a1d47d3a4b8@mail.gmail.com>
This is a great article. Thanks for passing it on. I am still a student so things like this are absolutely mandatory for me. Thanks again On 6/22/07, zoran knezevic <zoransa@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Today Search engine Journal is running interesting story about > validation and SEO: > > > http://www.searchenginejournal.com/seo-importance-of-valid-source-code-w3c-validation/5166/ > > They point out that Google pages do not validate. > > Article is very good. > > Best, > > -- > Zoran > > > http://www.rentalio.com/ http://www.aromaticlub.com/ > > On 6/22/07, David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk> wrote: > > > > On 22 Jun 2007, at 02:47, email@ipods.net wrote: > > > Has anyone ever noticed that Google.com does not validate? > > > > Plenty of people have. > > > > > Why does the 3rd most popular site on the web not worry about > > > validation? > > > > Have you tried asking them? Presumably they don't care about the time > > in QA that could be saved. > > > > -- > > David Dorward > > http://dorward.me.uk/ > > http://blog.dorward.me.uk/ > > > > > > > > > > -- David Moore http://d4hveed.blogspot.com http://www.myspace.com/davidingreenvegas ______________________________ I am, therefore IP.
Received on Friday, 22 June 2007 18:04:42 UTC