Re: Feed Validator service bugs

hi Ryan,

On Jun 14, 2007, at 13:23 , ryan wrote:
> Here's an example:
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <feed xmlns="" xml:base="http:// 

Looks like the feedvalidator didn't like having to validate xml:base  
values when it can't figure the base URI for the whole document  
(since doesn't have any in the case of direct input). I patched that,  
the example you gave seems to be validating nicely now, it seems.

I'll be sending my patch to the feedvalidator folks - I know that the  
direct input method is not officially supported by them but I hope  
they'll accept it.

> * references "Atom 1.1". AFAIK,  
> there is no such thing. There's Atom 1.0 (aka Atom Syndication) and  
> there's draft 11 of the Atom Publishing Protocol, but those are  
> different things.

I fixed that, too. And took the opportunity to update the  
feedvalidator to its latest version.

Thanks a lot for the bug report. If you find anything, don't hesitate  
to report it.


Received on Thursday, 14 June 2007 18:57:50 UTC