On 6/12/07, Greg Sabin <movingpictures4u@yahoo.com> wrote: > I was not able to get W3.org to make the validator work with Microsoft > office live web sites. It would seem the people at W3.org don't like Microsoft or their > programming vary much. > The validator is actually Vary limited in what it can and can not do , and > when I asked I was told in no short terms that I should make my web site > conform to the validator , rather then have the validator be able to read > multiple formats on a single web site. > I have noticed many vary good looking web sites can not pass the W3.org test > , possibly W3.org is only interested in diction and grammar verses real life > applications , free thinking and or thinking out side of the box. > Why ? I have no idea. Greg, What is it that you would like the W3C validator to do? Maybe there is a misunderstanding of its purpose? Regards, PeterReceived on Tuesday, 12 June 2007 20:35:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:59:02 UTC