- From: Sierk Bornemann <sierkb@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:16:51 +0200
- To: Gez Lemon <gez@juicystudio.com>
- Cc: Andries Louw Wolthuizen <info@andrieslouw.nl>, www-validator Community <www-validator@w3.org>
Am 31.07.2007 um 16:55 schrieb Gez Lemon: >> * if accept headers present, and application/xhtml+xml not accepted, >> send text/html >> * else, send application/xhtml+xml > > It is sane, and possible to do. Of course, this would be sane. But how to translate into a working solution *without* asking the client's (in this case the valdator's) accept header? Any suggestion? Any algorithm out there (for PHP or JSP or other frameworks) does rely on the browser's accept header and asks for the *existance* of "application/xhtml+xml" in the accept header of the client. I, so far, have never seen any working solution, which asks for the *non-existance* of "application/xhtml+xml". All implementations of the algorithm cited, I have seen so far, do ask for the *existance* of "application/xhtml+xml". So, how would you implement the *opposite* of that, if you have requesting user agents, which provide an empty accept header string or provide a meaningful "*" as the Internet Explorer does? > The rest seems to be concerned with > encouraging the validator team to include an accept header, which I > don't feel strongly about one way or the other. That's the point, Gez. That's the point. Not the theoretical algorithm drafted by Oliver (and nodded through you and me and maybe many others) above -- how do you implement such algorithm *without* asking the client's accept header? I am very curious and would be very happy about a working solution. I haven't found one yet so far. Maybe you? Sierk -- Sierk Bornemann email: sierkb@gmx.de WWW: http://sierkbornemann.de/
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2007 15:16:59 UTC