- From: Andreas Prilop <Prilop2007@trashmail.net>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:38:10 +0200 (MEST)
- To: www-validator@w3.org
- cc: Sierk Bornemann <sierkb@gmx.de>
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Sierk Bornemann wrote: >> AddType application/xhtml+xml;qs=0.95 xhtml > > Easy said. But how does this function with generated output *without* > providing the content *twice*, either as .xhtml file and as .html file? *Of course* the content exists twice: http://www.unics.uni-hannover.de/nhtcapri/ruby-annotation.html http://www.unics.uni-hannover.de/nhtcapri/ruby-annotation.xhtml Compare the content - they *are* different. HTML and XHTML are different. > But not for sites with many content files. It is far from practise, > to provide all content files twice as .html and also as .xhtml files. That would be a silly idea. When you have a single document, you serve it with the appropriate MIME type. > You need a method, to serve the MIMEtype dynamically for *one single > document* depending on what the client accepts. No, this is just a silly idea. You choose the correct MIME type according to your document. -- In memoriam Alan J. Flavell http://groups.google.com/groups/search?q=author:Alan.J.Flavell
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2007 13:38:30 UTC