- From: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 10:54:56 +0100
- To: "D. Van Laanen" <dvl@hottingersignals.com>
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:57:53 -0400 "D. Van Laanen" <dvl@hottingersignals.com> wrote: > NOTE: Whenever possible, give the address of the document you were > checking. > > I checked my website > www.HottingerSignals.com > and rec'd 26 validation errors. > > My webmaster tells me: > <<< Not something to lose sleep over, there are a lot of source code > features that the validator has not accepted yet.>>> That gibberish translates as "I don't understand HTML, but I can still blind you with science because you don't either." The errors support this translation quite strongly. > Is this correct, or is she mistaken and operating behind the curve? It seems to be optimised for the bugs in 1996-7 browsers. That is to say, those running on MS Windows or emulating Windows bugs too. It relies on quite a lot of error-correction in a browser. -- Nick Kew Application Development with Apache - the Apache Modules Book http://www.apachetutor.org/
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2007 09:55:04 UTC