- From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 13:01:18 +0900
- To: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Cc: www-validator Community <www-validator@w3.org>
On Feb 16, 2007, at 04:22 , Elliotte Harold wrote: > Near as I can tell the LogValidator merely tells me which pages I > need to fix. It doesn't give me specific errors for those pages. I > still need to check each one manually to find out what to fix? Is > that accurate? Correct. We could indeed list individual errors for each resource found to be invalid, but I'm afraid it would make the output very, very verbose. Maybe as an option. Adding an RFE in bugzilla, to be revisited later. http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4333 > I don't have SMTP working on the machine so if it's mailing me > results, I'm not getting them. I just see what it prints on stdout. Mail is only triggered if you ask for it. You also have an option to output to an HTML document, which may be more readable. The information, however, is similar in all three cases - only the format differs. -- olivier
Received on Friday, 16 February 2007 04:01:27 UTC