www-validator@w3.org from February 2007 by date

Tuesday, 27 February 2007

• Re: Form name complaint on HTML 4.0 Trans Elliotte Harold
• Re: Form name complaint on HTML 4.0 Trans David Dorward
• Form name complaint on HTML 4.0 Trans Angelos \(Exevior.com\)
• Re: Validating XHTML straight from the site Rui del-Negro
• Re: Feedback: Doing great work olivier Thereaux
• Re: Validating XHTML straight from the site olivier Thereaux

Monday, 26 February 2007

• Re: Feedback: Doing great work AOE media GmbH - Kian T. Gould
• Validating XHTML straight from the site AOE media GmbH - Kian T. Gould

Sunday, 25 February 2007

• Re: checklink David Dorward
• checklink Sacha Catalano

Saturday, 24 February 2007

• Re: [VE][108] no colour attribute? Paul Nelson

Friday, 23 February 2007

• Re: [VE][108] no colour attribute? Andreas Prilop
• [VE][108] no colour attribute? Gavin Griffiths

Thursday, 22 February 2007

• Re: using tidy in Markup Validator olivier Thereaux
• Re: The CSS Validator page is down olivier Thereaux

Wednesday, 21 February 2007

• The CSS Validator page is down Lance Taylor
• Re: [VE][25] Validator Picks Out PHP Variables in Link URL Andreas Prilop
• Re: [VE][25] Validator Picks Out PHP Variables in Link URL Damien Bonvillain
• Re: [VE][25] Validator Picks Out PHP Variables in Link URL David Dorward
• [VE][25] Validator Picks Out PHP Variables in Link URL pjm

Monday, 19 February 2007

• Re: invalid character stops the validation Andreas Prilop
• Re: invalid character stops the validation Drake Wilson

Sunday, 18 February 2007

• invalid character stops the validation RICHARD SCHAFER

Friday, 16 February 2007

• Re: Validating POST results Elliotte Harold
• Re: Validation results (with logvalidator) Elliotte Harold
• Re: Validation of apostrophe richard Eskins
• Re: Validation of apostrophe Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: Validation of apostrophe richard Eskins
• Re: Inconsistene config file syntax olivier Thereaux
• Re: Validating POST results olivier Thereaux
• Re: Validation results (with logvalidator) olivier Thereaux
• Re: Invalid pages... olivier Thereaux

Thursday, 15 February 2007

• Inconsistene config file syntax Elliotte Harold
• Validation results Elliotte Harold
• Validating POST results Elliotte Harold
• Re: Invalid pages... Jukka K. Korpela

Wednesday, 14 February 2007

• Invalid pages... Bachu

Thursday, 15 February 2007

• Re: The continuing saga of LogValidator on Mac OS X Elliotte Harold
• Re: The continuing saga of LogValidator on Mac OS X Elliotte Harold
• Re: The continuing saga of LogValidator on Mac OS X Elliotte Harold
• Re: The continuing saga of LogValidator on Mac OS X olivier Thereaux
• Re: Validation of apostrophe olivier Thereaux

Wednesday, 14 February 2007

• Re: Validation of apostrophe Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: Validation of apostrophe olivier Thereaux
• Re: Validation of apostrophe Jukka K. Korpela
• Validation of apostrophe richard Eskins

Tuesday, 13 February 2007

• Re: using tidy in Markup Validator Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
• Re: using tidy in Markup Validator Elliotte Harold
• Re: using tidy in Markup Validator Karl Dubost

Monday, 12 February 2007

• Re: Improvement of error message Michael Adams
• Re: Improvement of error message Andreas Prilop
• Re: What is the valid DTD for <a href? Andreas Prilop
• Re: will https validation be available soon? Ville Skyttä
• Re: What is the valid DTD for <a href? Drake Wilson
• Re: Add Subject Here Drake Wilson

Sunday, 11 February 2007

• What is the valid DTD for <a href? Chris H

Friday, 9 February 2007

• Add Subject Here RSikkel

Saturday, 10 February 2007

• will https validation be available soon? Chris H
• Re: Improvement of error message L. R. Goosens

Friday, 9 February 2007

• The continuing saga of LogValidator on Mac OS X Elliotte Harold
• Re: W3C validation link Rui del-Negro

Thursday, 8 February 2007

• W3C validation link Steve Collins

Friday, 9 February 2007

• Re: Improvement of error message Andreas Prilop

Thursday, 8 February 2007

• Announce: mobileok-checker mailing list + "Checker Fest" event Michael(tm) Smith
• Announce: mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0, last-call comments due March 6 Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: using tidy in Markup Validator olivier Thereaux

Tuesday, 6 February 2007

• Improvement of error message L. R. Goosens

Wednesday, 7 February 2007

• Re: using tidy in Markup Validator David Dorward
• Re: using tidy in Markup Validator Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
• Re: using tidy in Markup Validator David Dorward
• using tidy in Markup Validator olivier Thereaux
• Re: "character data is not allowed here" problem with Unicode Chinese Philip & Le Khanh
• Re: "character data is not allowed here" problem with Unicode Chinese Allan Dyer
• Re: "character data is not allowed here" problem with Unicode Chinese olivier Thereaux
• Re: "character data is not allowed here" problem with Unicode Chinese Allan Dyer

Tuesday, 6 February 2007

• Re: "character data is not allowed here" problem with Unicode Chinese Michael Adams
• Re: "character data is not allowed here" problem with Unicode Chinese Andreas Prilop
• Re: "character data is not allowed here" problem with Unicode Chinese Nick Kew
• Re: "character data is not allowed here" problem with Unicode Chinese olivier Thereaux
• "character data is not allowed here" problem with Unicode Chinese Allan Dyer
• Re: Invalid html from validator Jukka K. Korpela

Friday, 2 February 2007

• Invalid html from validator Keith Hopper
• Is uploaded_file a valid parameter when invoking Feed Validator via Web Service API PAUL J DICK

Monday, 5 February 2007

• Re: Support for compressed (gz) files? Ville Skyttä
• Support for compressed (gz) files? Andreas Prilop
• Re: http://www.viari.it/ David Dorward
• Re: http://www.viari.it/ VIARI

Saturday, 3 February 2007

• Re: Characters "<" and "&" incorrectly reported as warnings only David Håsäther
• Characters "<" and "&" incorrectly reported as warnings only Jukka K. Korpela

Friday, 2 February 2007

• The continuing saga of LogValidator on Mac OS X Elliotte Harold
• Re: LogValidator and HTTP Elliotte Harold
• LogValidator and HTTP olivier Thereaux

Thursday, 1 February 2007

• Re: LogValidator on OS X Elliotte Harold
• Re: LogValidator on OS X Elliotte Harold
• Re: LogValidator on OS X Elliotte Harold
• Re: LogValidator on OS X Elliotte Harold
• Re: A simpler Web service response format Elliotte Harold
• Re: A simpler Web service response format Elliotte Harold
• Re: Why does LogValidator dpeend on SOAP? Elliotte Harold
• Re: Why does LogValidator dpeend on SOAP? Olivier Thereaux
• Re: A simpler Web service response format Olivier Thereaux
• Re: A simpler Web service response format Elliotte Harold
• Why does LogValidator dpeend on SOAP? Elliotte Harold
• Re: LogValidator on OS X Elliotte Harold
• Re: LogValidator on OS X Karl Dubost
• Re: LogValidator on OS X Karl Dubost
• Re: LogValidator on OS X olivier Thereaux
• Re: LogValidator on OS X Karl Dubost
• Re: LogValidator on OS X olivier Thereaux

Last message date: Tuesday, 27 February 2007 22:23:19 UTC