- From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
- Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 16:41:37 +0200
- To: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>, "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org>, "Shane McCarron" <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: "W3C RDFa task force" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, <www-validator@w3.org>
Niklas, Same as to Ivan: You are talking about the new validator [1], right? >xml:base doesn't seem to work either. [...] >I also miss an "XHTML plus RDFa" entry in the "Document Type" select >of "More Options". >Btw, should lang be allowed (along with xml:lang)? The validator >doesn't support it for XHTML 1.1 (but for e.g. XHTML 1.0 Strict). >In any event, it's great that this is deployed now; thanks! So, to clarify this: It is NOT the RDFa TF that has 'anything' to do with this validation service [1]. The QA WG develops and maintains it [2]; now it seems they adopted Shanes's DTD [3]. All credits (and suggestions) should therefore go to 'www-validator@w3.org' (I cc'ed them already in this mail). Hope that helps, anyway - I'm also just a simple user of this, btw handy, service :) Cheers, Michael [1] http://validator.w3.org/ [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFaTC#Approval_2007-08-02 [3] http://validator.w3.org/whatsnew.html [4] http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/xhtml-rdfa-1.dtd ---------------------------------------------------------- Michael Hausenblas, MSc. Institute of Information Systems & Information Management JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH http://www.joanneum.at/iis/ ----------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 8 August 2007 14:40:19 UTC