- From: Sierk Bornemann <sierkb@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:48:19 +0200
- To: Andreas Prilop <AndreasPrilop2007@trashmail.net>
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
Am 27.04.2007 um 17:14 schrieb Andreas Prilop: > IE 6 is known to ignore the Content-Type in most cases. So just name > your files *.html 99% of all files on my server just all *are* of .html, Andreas. :-) > and IE 6 won't give a shit about your Content-Type. If you say so, than it will be the truth, I guess. :-) But I doubt, that you are right. > Compare > http://www.unics.uni-hannover.de/nhtcapri/temp/ruby-with-dir.xhtml > http://www.unics.uni-hannover.de/nhtcapri/temp/ruby-with-dir.x.html Nothing new to me, Andreas. The same mechanism as practised on http://sierkbornemann.de/pub/misc/tux and http://sierkbornemann.de/pub/docs/pferdehintern_und_spaceshuttle :-) > is just clueless. The given meta element is worthless for XHTML documents, who are parsed with the XML parser of the browser, if served with "application/xhtml+xml". As far as I know, it is even not *read* by an XML parser. But it doesn't harm either, if parsed in XML mode. I won't say, that that was a clueless decision, Andreas. Andreas, any other things, you are able to contribute? Or do you just want to bitch a little bit? We tend to get a little OT here. Let's return to the validator's topics. Sierk -- Sierk Bornemann email: sierkb@gmx.de WWW: http://sierkbornemann.de/
Received on Friday, 27 April 2007 15:48:27 UTC