- From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:11:11 +0900
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: Sierk Bornemann <sierkb@gmx.de>, "www-validator@w3.org Community" <www-validator@w3.org>
On Apr 26, 2007, at 00:16 , Shane McCarron wrote: > Actually, I beg to differ. Neither the previous Recommendation of > XHTML 1.1 [1] nor the current Editors Draft of XHTML 1.1 [2] says > you SHOULD NOT send XHTML 1.1 as text/html. If you are referring > to the informative note that was written by Masayasu [3] some years > ago... that's not normative. You're right. To be absolutely accurate, [2] precisely says [[ XHTML 1.1 documents SHOULD be labeled with the Internet Media Type "application/xhtml+xml" ]] and for further information refers to [3]. > [2] http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Drafts/xhtml11 > [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-media-types Are you begging to differ on the wording alone (on which I stand corrected) or are you also suggesting that the validator should not give a warning for not respecting the SHOULD recommendation in XHTML 1.1's conformance section? What is the XHTML's working group stance on the matter? Thank you -- olivier
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2007 01:12:23 UTC