On Apr 24, 2007, at 19:46 , Sam Ruby wrote: > By not positively asserting that it accepts XHTML, it is > pedantically applying a rule in a way that penalizes those that are > attempting to do the right thing in the face of indifference and > inaction by the vendor of the dominant browser. Calling the application of the rule "pedantic" is rather disingenuous. I agree with you on the fact that validator should send accept headers (see [1]), but it doesn't change the fact that serving XHTML 1.1 as text/html, in *any* circumstance, is wrong. If one wants text/ html, there's XHTML 1.0 with HTML compat guidelines -- olivierReceived on Tuesday, 24 April 2007 11:09:56 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:59:01 UTC