- From: Felix Miata <mrmazda@ij.net>
- Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 22:30:54 -0400
- To: www-validator@w3.org
On 06/09/20 02:25 (GMT+0200) Martin Kliehm apparently typed: > your mail is inpolite, you don't provide any reasons for your claim, and > it's off-topic. Off-topic I believe is true, so why are you continuing off-topic discussion? > Why is "font-size: 86%" in your opinion "stupid"? ... > And what's "not reader-friendly" when using "font-size: 86%"? > Please provide reasonable arguments, not public arbitrary hostilities. http://www.w3.org/QA/Tips/font-size summarizes the right thing to do. Reducing the base size from your visitor's preference by an arbitrary amount serves no purpose but to frustrate users and make your page less accessible and usable. If you want more reasons why it's wrong, you can find many on the web, but the links at the top of http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/auth/wauth1.html and most on http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/auth/wauth2.html should get you well along. -- "Wisdom is supreme; therefore get wisdom. Though it cost all you have, get understanding. Esteem her, and she will exalt you; embrace her, and she will honor you." Proverbs 4:7-8 NIV Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 Felix Miata *** http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/
Received on Wednesday, 20 September 2006 02:30:23 UTC