- From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 16:15:11 +0900
- To: Frans Nijs <FransNijs@telenet.be>
- Cc: <www-validator@w3.org>
Dear Frans,
You wrote:
> Links like javascript:function%20sDqUikyQKC(w,p)%7Bvar%20i,t='';for
> (i=0;i%3Cw.frames.length;i++)t+=sDqUikyQKC(w.frames[i],p+'%20%20%20%
> 20');return(p+w.document..lastModified+%20(w.name?('%20('+w.name
> +')'):'')+'%5Cn'+t);%7Dalert('Laatst%20veranderd:%5Cn%
> 5Cn'+sDqUikyQKC(window,'')) javascript:function%20sDqUikyQKC(w,p)%
> 7Bvar%20i,t='';for(i=0;i%3Cw.frames.length;i++)t+=sDqUikyQKC
> (w.frames[i],p+'%20%20%20%20');return(p+w.document..lastModified+%20
> (w.name?('%20('+w.name+')'):'')+'%5Cn'+t);%7Dalert('Laatst%
> 20veranderd:%5Cn%5Cn'+sDqUikyQKC(window,'')) shoudn't be checked.
What is your rationale behind this? Could you be a little clearer
about what type of links should not be checked?
Also, if possible, please configure your mail software to send mails
without heavy (and horrible) HTML formatting when sending mails to
W3C mailing-lists. Plain text would be great.
Thank you.
--
olivier
(please reply to the list, not only me)
Received on Wednesday, 25 October 2006 07:15:24 UTC