- From: Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@iki.fi>
- Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 20:27:57 +0300
- To: Jon Ribbens <jon+www-validator@unequivocal.co.uk>
- Cc: Mike Holden <mike-holden@tiscali.co.uk>, www-validator@w3.org
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 13:00 +0100, Jon Ribbens wrote: > Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@iki.fi> wrote: > > > The problem is that the line in the code for this link is Line 144, > > > not 133. > > > > I ran a few quick tests against some documents, and the line numbers > > work as expected in them for me. Without an URL to the "particular > > webpage" you experienced the problem with, there's not much that can be > > done to diagnose this further. > > Bearing in mind that documents can and do use CR, LF, CR+LF, > and sometimes a mixture of those options, to indicate line-endings, > sometimes there can be no single definition of what constitutes a > "line number". Sure. The next version of the link checker will outsource that problem to the HTML::Parser perl module, which is one reason why I would have been interested in hearing about useful use case URLs, to see how/if the change affects things in various scenarios.
Received on Tuesday, 23 May 2006 17:28:03 UTC