- From: David Gatwood <dgatwood@mac.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 12:05:14 -0800
- To: "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
On Feb 23, 2006, at 9:59 PM, Jukka K. Korpela wrote: > Thus, read the validator messages. The first message, for example, > is quite understandable: "document type does not allow element > 'BODY' here", because you have declared a Frameset DTD, where a > HEAD element must not be followed by a BODY element but by a > FRAMESET element. On staring at the DTD more closely, it looks like libxml's DTD code does not correctly ignore redefinition of entities. I'll file a bug against libxml. > In practice, it is best to consult first a suitable tutorial, > reference, or specification on HTML in order to write a > syntactically correct Frameset document, if that's what you want. > Validators are best used to track down unintentional small syntax > errors, rather than working with documents where the overall > structure is syntactically wrong. The problem is that it appears to be impossible, even in "loose", to legally use a frameset and the NOSCRIPT tag in the same document, which seriously limits the ability to create client-side dynamic content that involves frames.... Looks like I'll just have to wait for a fixed version of the spec before attempting compliance.... Thanks, David
Received on Friday, 24 February 2006 20:05:27 UTC