Re: Validator for HTML 1.0

Jukka K. Korpela wrote:

>> <http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/draft-ietf-iiir-html-01.txt>
 
> It contains a document type definition, but the problem is
> that the SGML declaration has OMITTAG NO and SHORTTAG NO.
> I'm afraid this would require a new parse mode.

Is that different from XHTML ?  (my complete SGML knowledge
is still strictly limited to "Jukka understands what it is")

> I suppose, however, that the wish was not entirely serious.

The link is nice, I didn't know that old spec.  It even had
"made" as <link> type, and tons of other interesting ideas
what to do with <link>.
                           Bye, Frank

Received on Friday, 17 February 2006 12:17:45 UTC