- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:59:35 +0900
- To: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Cc: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, www-validator@w3.org, www-international@w3.org
Le 8 déc. 2006 à 21:01, olivier Thereaux a écrit :
> On Dec 7, 2006, at 21:56 , Karl Dubost wrote:
>>
>> Time for interoperability testing and implementation report
>> http://esw.w3.org/topic/QA/Utf8BomInteropReport
>>
>> Feel free to modify the wording of the page or to provide a better
>> way to test.
>
> I think the test reporting should probably be changed from good/bad
> (defined by passing the first test I assume?) to noting which of
> the basic/extended test passes or fails.
Good comments
There are four files in the page
Classic cases:
http://www.w3.org/International/tests/test-utf8-signature/withoutbom-
withcharset.html
http://www.w3.org/International/tests/test-utf8-signature/withoutbom-
nocharset.html
These for really the BOM testing
http://www.w3.org/International/tests/test-utf8-signature/withbom-
withcharset.html
http://www.w3.org/International/tests/test-utf8-signature/withbom-
nocharset.html
I think to make it easier, it is better to limit the test to
with BOM, with Charset
http://www.w3.org/International/tests/test-utf8-signature/withbom-
withcharset.html
> My browser for instance passes the basi test but not the extended,
> which seems to mean that the BOM is not harmful to it, but it's not
> used either.
Which means that the browser is working well. no. Because HTTP has
precedence.
The pages served as US-ASCII MUST fail.
> If we are to draw conclusions from this testing, we might as well
> see whether the BOM breaks implementations AND whether it is used
> at all.
Shall we give the expected results ?
This is the normal result in an HTTP environment.
Passed - without BOM with charset (served as utf-8)
Failed - without BOM without charset (served as us-ascii)
Passed - with BOM with charset (served as utf-8)
Failed - with BOM without charset (served as us-ascii)
For authoring tool (which are not HTTP user agents), only the test
with BOM with charset is meaningful.
I have added this table to the page, feel free to modify
http://esw.w3.org/topic/QA/Utf8BomInteropReport
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Monday, 11 December 2006 03:00:10 UTC