- From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:38:56 +0100
- To: "J. Greenlees" <jaqui@jaqui-greenlees.net>
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 02:18:20AM -0700, J. Greenlees wrote: > Non Valid code in xml docuents with css: > > <p> > <a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=referer"><img > src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-xhtml10" > alt="Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict" height="31" width="88" /></a> > </p> If I understand your argument correctly: The validity of some markup is dependent on the DTD specified in the Doctype, not the use (or otherwise) or a stylesheet. The height and width attributes exist for all published versions of XHTML, including Strict variants. Arguably, they belong there as they describe the image rather then define its presentation (at least so long as you use them to specify the actual pixel dimensions of the image). -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk
Received on Thursday, 10 August 2006 15:39:13 UTC