- From: Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 13:27:19 +0200
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
True, and certainly a long-awaited step in the right
direction : unfortunately there is still some way
to go, as if one then attempts to validate their
CSS one gets considerably more errors than one might
reasonably expect ...
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.microsoft.com%2F
Philip Taylor
--------
Simone Onofri wrote:
> Hi to all,
>
> I'm testing the funcions of new Validator developed by the W3C
> Validator Team. On test page...
>
> http://validator.w3.org/dev/tests/
>
> There is a paragraph named: Docs that are probably invalid
> (we must FIX THIS! It's not reliable any more...)
>
> Well, Microsoft's Web site passed the Validator test for HTML
> 4.0
> Transitional.
>
> This is a great step... Microsoft follows W3C's Standard.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Simone Onofri
Received on Saturday, 24 September 2005 11:27:23 UTC