Re: W3C Validator vs Schneegans

Christoph Schneegans <> wrote:

>This is fully intentional and complies with
><>. I know that the W3C validator accepts
>an encoding declaration in a "meta" element for XHTML documents served as
>"text/html", and I consider this a bug.

I consider it broken as designed, but lets not get into whether it's the spec or
the implementation that's broken…

  “If at first you don't succeed, keep shooting.”  -- monk

Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2005 07:03:19 UTC