- From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 08:25:16 +0100
- To: www-validator@w3.org
On Sat, 2005-10-29 at 03:37 +0200, Frank Ellermann wrote:
> David Dorward wrote:
>
> > ... so how about you do that?
>
> Something's odd here, the OP had & everywhere,
No, he didn't. He missed one.
> Completely beside the point, the first & isn't needed, the
> URL works also without it (second & replaced by & here);
There is a difference between a URL written in plain text (in which the
character "&" is correct), and a URL written in HTML (in which "&" must
be expressed as "&".
> test
Your example has all the "&" characters expressed as "&".
--
David Dorward <http://dorward.me.uk/>
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad, in some way or another."
-- The Greatest Show in the Galaxy
Received on Saturday, 29 October 2005 07:20:51 UTC