- From: Etan Wexler <ewexler@stickdog.com>
- Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 12:05:20 -0400
- To: Validationeers <www-validator@w3.org>
- CC: Clitheroe Kid <clitheroekid@hotmail.com>
... And, lo, the list members heard an utterance: > A tag which does not cause the page to break ought not to be failed by the > validator. Then, verily, but in vain, did they cry: A person who does not understand the validator ought not to complain about the validator. -- Cheers.
Received on Sunday, 15 May 2005 16:23:14 UTC