- From: WD <ward@sama.ru>
- Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 00:27:01 +0400
- To: <www-validator@w3.org>
Many thanks
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Dorward" <david@dorward.me.uk>
To: "WD" <ward@sama.ru>
Cc: <www-validator@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 8:44 PM
Subject: Re: is my web page valid for xhtml 1.0?
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 02:17:43AM +0400, WD wrote:
> > Would you help me please?
> >
> > MS IE6 don`t understand JavaScript expression:
> > for (var i=0; i < 9; i++) {......}
> > It is't understand < in this context.
>
> It is very unlikely that you are serving your XHTML as
> application/xhtml+xml (since IE isn't prompting you to download it),
> so you are presumably serving it as text/html and browsers are
> treating it as tag soup.
>
> The <script> block is therefore being treated as CDATA even though you
> haven't explicitly tagged it as such and the entities are not being
> processed.
>
> Go back and read http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#h-4.8 again. A read of
> http://www.hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml probably wouldn't go amiss either.
>
> > May I use both :
>
> <snip code>
>
> > on my WEB page at the same time?
>
> You can lie if you like. Its not going to look very good if people
> click on the link and get big red error messages though.
>
> http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/html/validation.html#icon is probably
> also worth a read.
>
> > Will be my document valid for XHTML 1.0 Transitional in fact???
>
> No, it won't.
>
> --
> David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2005 20:24:36 UTC