- From: WD <ward@sama.ru>
- Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 00:27:01 +0400
- To: <www-validator@w3.org>
Many thanks ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Dorward" <david@dorward.me.uk> To: "WD" <ward@sama.ru> Cc: <www-validator@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 8:44 PM Subject: Re: is my web page valid for xhtml 1.0? > On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 02:17:43AM +0400, WD wrote: > > Would you help me please? > > > > MS IE6 don`t understand JavaScript expression: > > for (var i=0; i < 9; i++) {......} > > It is't understand < in this context. > > It is very unlikely that you are serving your XHTML as > application/xhtml+xml (since IE isn't prompting you to download it), > so you are presumably serving it as text/html and browsers are > treating it as tag soup. > > The <script> block is therefore being treated as CDATA even though you > haven't explicitly tagged it as such and the entities are not being > processed. > > Go back and read http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#h-4.8 again. A read of > http://www.hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml probably wouldn't go amiss either. > > > May I use both : > > <snip code> > > > on my WEB page at the same time? > > You can lie if you like. Its not going to look very good if people > click on the link and get big red error messages though. > > http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/html/validation.html#icon is probably > also worth a read. > > > Will be my document valid for XHTML 1.0 Transitional in fact??? > > No, it won't. > > -- > David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2005 20:24:36 UTC