Fascinating : I see the difference, and can't explain it as of now ... Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > * Philip TAYLOR wrote: > >>No, I think you missed the point : it quite clearly >>says 'character "1" not allowed in prolog.'. There >>/is/ no 'character "1"' in the source, so there must >>be a genuine bug in the validator code which is >>causing this 'character "1"' to be generated and >>inserted into the parsing stream ... > > > I see, then I am unable to reproduce this, there is no such message > in <http://validator.w3.org:8001/check?uri=data%3Atext%2Fhtml%2C>.Received on Thursday, 14 July 2005 17:14:07 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:58:52 UTC