- From: Etan Wexler <ewexler@stickdog.com>
- Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 01:49:24 -0500
- To: Ron Falconberry <ronfalcon@comcast.net>, Validation Crew <www-validator@w3.org>
Ron Falconberry wrote to <mailto:www-validator@w3.org> on 22 January 2005 in "HTML Validator" (<mid:000001c50102$272362c0$c2503444@homeprimary>): > I could not find an answer in the Help or FAQ section of the W3C so I > hope that it is appropriate for me to send my question here. How about an advisory near the beginning of the evaluation page? To wit: "Note: The URL you gave me, <http://www.falconberry.com/>, returned a redirect to <http://localhost/>." That explains the end result of the proclamation of valid XHTML despite the non-XHTML nature of the referring document. The validator is retrieving a document from what one presumes is a server owned and operated by W3C. The question is why this happens. I was unable to provoke the alleged redirection in the HTTP header served by your Apache installation. I was unable to provoke the alleged redirection in the document proper. Caveat: testing was cursory. > I am in the process of validating my web site pages under HTML 4.01 > transitional. For the pages that I have changed to validate properly I > have added the W3C check box at the bottom of the page. Why? Jukka Korpela presents the foremost argument against this practice in "Say no to “Valid HTML” icons" (<http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/html/validation.html#icon>). -- “He wrote himself a prescription, and your name was mentioned in it.” —Leonard Cohen, “One of Us Cannot Be Wrong”
Received on Sunday, 23 January 2005 06:49:07 UTC