- From: Jonathan LF King <squash@math.ufl.edu>
- Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:49:51 -0500 (EST)
- To: www-validator@w3.org
Dear W3C (2)
I am using your nice
http://validator.w3.org/checklink
for checking the links on my course webpages; thank you for
providing it.
My webpages have a link to your html-validator.
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/check/referer
Alas, your link-verifier complains about the link to the
validator. Here is an example:
/----------------------------------------------------------\
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/check/referer
What to do: Usually the sign of a malformed URL that
cannot be parsed by the server.
Response status code: 400
Response message: Bad Request
\__________________________________________________________/
=====================================
I have a related feature-request (related, because it
enlarges the "http://jigsaw.../referer" syntax). Page
http://validator.w3.org/docs/users.html#Options
says, in part,
/----------------------------------------------------------\
.... To add options to your links directly, append the
options separated by a semi-colon. For example
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.example.com/;ss=1;outline=1;sp=1
will validate the example.com home page with "Show Source",
"Outline" and "Show Parse Tree" on, but "Exclude
Attributes" off.
\__________________________________________________________/
I would find it convenient of a similar feature were
permitted on the
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/check/referer
link, e.g, perhaps
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/check/referer;ss=1;outline=1;sp=1
or some such.
Thank you. Sincerely, -Jonathan King
--
Prof. Jonathan LF King Mathematics dept, Univ. of Florida
<squash@math.ufl.edu>, <http://www.math.ufl.edu/~squash/>
Received on Friday, 30 December 2005 08:13:40 UTC