- From: leif halvard silli <hyperlekken@lenk.no>
- Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 20:11:03 +0200
- To: www-validator@w3.org
hi -- I came to wonder about the policy behind which encodings (charsets) that the Validator support. Is the reason for not supporting the very common (on ourplatform) x-mac-encodings political (for instance the result of a puristic wish to only support the IANA registred charsets) or is the reason practical. (If it is both, then I would like to know what is the most important reason.) I ask because I was very suprised to find out that x-mac-roman was not accepted. Instead the validator adviced me to use 'macintosh' as charset name. We Mac users live in this very perfect world where all encodings are named x-mac-something. Hardly any of us know or rember that there exist a kind of ascii parellell called just 'macintosh'. Mozilla/Firefox doesn't offer this encoding. And of all programs I have used only the venerable Cyberdog (remember that?) used 'macintosh', and only when sending e-mail -- that very thing was the reason I stopped using it since it made it incompatible other mac mailers. (PS: I checked previouis discussions about this issue. Please refrain from advicing me/us about text editors ...)
Received on Friday, 22 April 2005 19:28:44 UTC